Blood Test Watchdog

Empirical Health vs InsideTracker

Empirical Health is cheaper to start ($190 vs $489 per year, lowest published plans). Empirical Health scores higher overall (8.6 vs 7.1).

By Julian Caraulani · prices checked

Quick verdict

Our pick between the two: Empirical Health

Empirical Health scores 8.6/10 against 7.1 for InsideTracker, ahead on price and clinical care. InsideTracker can still be the better fit: it is best for data-minded testers who want an app-led action plan and do not need a clinician review.

Side by side

Empirical HealthInsideTracker
Lowest price$190/yr (one-time payment)$489/yr (first year; renews at full retail)
Our score8.6/107.1/10
TreatmentsLongevity membershipsLongevity memberships
Medication in priceNot statedNot stated
Drugs dispensedNot statedNot stated
LabsNot statedNot stated
MembershipNot statedNot stated
InsuranceNo; self-payNo; self-pay
StatesNot confirmed: no state list found on its own site (2026-10-31)All 50 states, per its own site (2026-10-31)
Cancellation$190 panel is a one-time payment. Subscriptions auto-renew unless cancelled before period end by contacting Empirical; account closes at end of billing period. Refund policy for the panel not found.Membership auto-renews annually at full retail price. Must cancel 30 days before the next billing date. Refunds only within 30 days of purchase/renewal and never after a blood sample is collected.
FDA warning lettersNone found (October 31, 2026)None found (October 31, 2026)
Trustpilot3.5/5 (3 reviews)No profile we could quote
Best forHeart-focused testers who want ApoB and Lp(a) with a doctor-written report for one payment.Data-minded testers who want an app-led action plan and do not need a clinician review.
Prices checked2026-10-312026-10-31

Price by treatment

The lowest all-in plan each publishes for the treatments both offer, with the page we read it on.

TreatmentEmpirical HealthInsideTracker
Longevity memberships$190/yr (one-time payment) source, 2026-10-31$489/yr (first year; renews at full retail) source, 2026-10-31

Empirical Health: a closer look

Heart-focused panel of 100+ items at Quest or BioReference, with a physician-interpreted report. We searched the FDA warning-letter database on October 31, 2026 and found no letter naming Empirical Health.

In its favour

  • One-time payment, no auto-renewing membership for the panel
  • ApoB and Lp(a) included
  • Publishes its NY and NJ price

To weigh

  • Doctor video visit and care plan only in the $399 program; the $190 panel gets a physician-interpreted report.
  • Biomarker count includes calculated ratios and risk scores.
  • Medical services in 'over 30 states' with no published exclusion list.
  • Only 3 Trustpilot reviews; little independent feedback.

InsideTracker: a closer look

Ultimate blood test plus an algorithm-driven action plan; physician approves the order. We searched the FDA warning-letter database on October 31, 2026 and found no letter naming InsideTracker.

In its favour

  • Claims HIPAA compliance and SOC 2 Type II
  • Partner labs stated as CLIA-certified
  • Mobile draw available everywhere it sells

To weigh

  • Highest cost per biomarker of this group: $489 for up to 54 markers is about $9 per marker, and the first year price includes the platform fee that renews.
  • 30-day advance cancellation window before renewal, and no refund once blood is drawn.
  • Promotional prices apply to the first term only; renewals at full retail.
  • Residents of NY, NJ, RI, HI (and AZ per product page) must pay $119 extra for mobile draw.

Which should you choose?

Choose Empirical Health

Best for heart-focused testers who want ApoB and Lp(a) with a doctor-written report for one payment. Its lowest all-in plan is $190/yr (one-time payment).

Check Empirical Health's price

Choose InsideTracker

Best for data-minded testers who want an app-led action plan and do not need a clinician review. Its lowest all-in plan is $489/yr (first year; renews at full retail).

Check InsideTracker's price

Empirical Health vs InsideTracker: questions people ask

Is Empirical Health or InsideTracker cheaper?

Empirical Health starts lower at $190 per year versus $489 at InsideTracker, comparing each program's lowest all-in plan.

Which is better, Empirical Health or InsideTracker?

On our published score Empirical Health rates 8.6 and InsideTracker rates 7.1. Empirical Health is best for heart-focused testers who want ApoB and Lp(a) with a doctor-written report for one payment; InsideTracker is best for data-minded testers who want an app-led action plan and do not need a clinician review.

Do Empirical Health and InsideTracker offer the same treatments?

Empirical Health: Longevity memberships. InsideTracker: Longevity memberships.

Does either include the medication in the price?

Empirical Health: not stated. InsideTracker: not stated.

Blood Test Watchdog compares testing services. It is not medical advice, does not interpret results and does not publish reference ranges as advice. Talk to a licensed clinician about which tests you need and what your results mean. Partner links may earn us a commission; our score never depends on it. Compare other programs.